Method Development and Validation (4 cr)
Code: 5O00CE78-3001
General information
- Enrolment period
- 28.11.2016 - 10.01.2017
- Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
- 01.01.2017 - 05.03.2017
- Implementation has ended.
- Credits
- 4 cr
- Local portion
- 3 cr
- Virtual portion
- 1 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Blended learning
- Unit
- Laboratory Engineering
- Campus
- TAMK Main Campus
- Teaching languages
- Finnish
- Seats
- 0 - 10
- Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Laboratory Engineering
- Teachers
- Anni-Kaisa Kurri
- Outi Heiniö
- Course
- 5O00CE78
Objectives (course unit)
Student is able to
- evaluate the analysis method and develop it further
- plan the validation of an analysis method
- make validation measurements in practice
- evaluate results using statistical methods
- write validation report
Content (course unit)
- method development with the help of literature
- writing the validation plan and doing the measurements in practice
- statistical evaluation of the measurements including the uncertainty estimate for the analysis
- validation report
Exam schedules
Ei tenttiä
Evaluation methods and criteria
Kirjallisuushaun hallitseminen, menetelmän kehittäminen, laboratoriotyöskentely, menetelmän validointi laskutoimituksineen (tilastomatematiikka) arvioidaan.
Assessment scale
0-5
Teaching methods
Kirjallisuuden kartoitus itsenäisesti, menetelmän laatiminen ja testaus (tarvittaessa ohjatusti), testatun menetelmän validointi.
Learning materials
Alan kirjallisuus.
Content scheduling
Menetelmän laatiminen, menetelmän kehitys laboratoriossa ja kehitetyn menetelmän validointi.
Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Students are able to develop methods of analysis by using literature as an aid and guidance of the teacher. He knows how to make Validation of the method and perform validation under guidance.
Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
In addition the student is able to develop the method independently. He is able to assess the reliability of analysis results and make independent method validation plan and method validation.
Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
In addition the student is able to develop a method of analysis independently. They will be able to draw up a comprehensive validation and evaluate the results of the validation. He can also, if necessary, plan and take the necessary follow-up action.