Advanced Motion Graphics Workshop (5 cr)
Code: AD00BZ55-3003
General information
- Enrolment period
- 30.04.2016 - 05.09.2016
- Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
- 01.09.2016 - 31.12.2016
- Implementation has ended.
- Credits
- 5 cr
- Local portion
- 4 cr
- Virtual portion
- 1 cr
- RDI portion
- 1 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Blended learning
- Unit
- Media and Arts
- Campus
- TAMK Mediapolis
- Teaching languages
- English
- Seats
- 5 - 25
- Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Media and Arts
- Teachers
- Carita Forsgren
- Ilmari Huttu-Hiltunen
- Tuomo Joronen
- Person in charge
- Carita Forsgren
- Course
- AD00BZ55
Objectives (course unit)
The students are able to:
- use up to date motion graphics design techniques, tools and working methods
- deepen their professional identity as web designers or developers
Content (course unit)
Advanced motion graphics design and programming
Prerequisites (course unit)
Basics of the subject
Exam schedules
No exam
Evaluation methods and criteria
Tasks, attendance, active participation, feedback to peers and teacher(s)
Assessment scale
0-5
Teaching methods
contact teaching (in English), individual and group tasks, virtual learning environment (Tabula), activity excursions, discussions, group work, giving and listening peer & teacher feedback, PBL on occasion, learning by doing, students as teachers
Learning materials
Course material given in class
Student workload
The student is expected to complete the course tasks partly outside the contact teaching times
Completion alternatives
The student can pass the course without attendance by:
Further information
Preliminary requirements:
Assessment criteria - fail (0) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Fail: Less than half of the course tasks submitted and / or rendered incorrectly; No or hardly any attendance in contact or online teaching; No feedback to peers and/or teachers
Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
1=approved; Half of the course tasks submitted; Misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; Attendance level in online and contact teaching low; No feedback to peers and/or teachers
2=satiscfactory; More than half of the course tasks submitted; Quality of tasks below average; Attendance level in online and contact teaching low or average; No or hardly any feedback to peers and/or teachers
Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
3= good; All course tasks submitted in timely fashion; Quality of tasks adequate; course attendance and feedback to peers and teachers satisfactory
4 = very good; All course tasks submitted in timely fashion; Quality of tasks adequate; good course attendance and active feedback to peers and teachers
Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
5 = excellent; all tasks rendered in an outstanding way in due time; high attendance and activity in online and contact teaching; active and well-thought feedback to peers and teachers