Skip to main content

Advanced Motion Graphics Workshop (5 cr)

Code: AD00BZ55-3003

General information


Enrolment period
30.04.2016 - 05.09.2016
Registration for the implementation has ended.
Timing
01.09.2016 - 31.12.2016
Implementation has ended.
Credits
5 cr
Local portion
4 cr
Virtual portion
1 cr
RDI portion
1 cr
Mode of delivery
Blended learning
Unit
Media and Arts
Campus
TAMK Mediapolis
Teaching languages
English
Seats
5 - 25
Degree programmes
Bachelor's Degree Programme in Media and Arts
Teachers
Carita Forsgren
Ilmari Huttu-Hiltunen
Tuomo Joronen
Person in charge
Carita Forsgren
Course
AD00BZ55

Objectives (course unit)

The students are able to:
- use up to date motion graphics design techniques, tools and working methods
- deepen their professional identity as web designers or developers

Content (course unit)

Advanced motion graphics design and programming

Prerequisites (course unit)

Basics of the subject

Exam schedules

No exam

Evaluation methods and criteria

Tasks, attendance, active participation, feedback to peers and teacher(s)

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

contact teaching (in English), individual and group tasks, virtual learning environment (Tabula), activity excursions, discussions, group work, giving and listening peer & teacher feedback, PBL on occasion, learning by doing, students as teachers

Learning materials

Course material given in class

Student workload

The student is expected to complete the course tasks partly outside the contact teaching times

Completion alternatives

The student can pass the course without attendance by:

Further information

Preliminary requirements:

Assessment criteria - fail (0) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Fail: Less than half of the course tasks submitted and / or rendered incorrectly; No or hardly any attendance in contact or online teaching; No feedback to peers and/or teachers

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

1=approved; Half of the course tasks submitted; Misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; Attendance level in online and contact teaching low; No feedback to peers and/or teachers

2=satiscfactory; More than half of the course tasks submitted; Quality of tasks below average; Attendance level in online and contact teaching low or average; No or hardly any feedback to peers and/or teachers

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

3= good; All course tasks submitted in timely fashion; Quality of tasks adequate; course attendance and feedback to peers and teachers satisfactory

4 = very good; All course tasks submitted in timely fashion; Quality of tasks adequate; good course attendance and active feedback to peers and teachers

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

5 = excellent; all tasks rendered in an outstanding way in due time; high attendance and activity in online and contact teaching; active and well-thought feedback to peers and teachers

Go back to top of page