Professional English for Nurses (3 cr)
Code: 7K00BK07-3018
General information
- Enrolment period
- 25.07.2016 - 04.09.2016
- Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
- 26.09.2016 - 16.10.2016
- Implementation has ended.
- Credits
- 3 cr
- Local portion
- 3 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Contact learning
- Unit
- Emergency Care, Midwifery, Public Health Nursing
- Campus
- TAMK Main Campus
- Teaching languages
- Finnish
- Seats
- 39 - 40
- Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Nursing and Health Care, Public Health Nursing
- Teachers
- Minna Metsäportti
- Person in charge
- Sari Himanen
- Small groups
- r1 (Size: 0 . Open UAS : 0.)
- r2 (Size: 0 . Open UAS : 0.)
- r3 (Size: 0 . Open UAS : 0.)
- Small groups
- r1
- r2
- r3
- Course
- 7K00BK07
Objectives (course unit)
The student
-is capable of asking, when conducting a patient interview, relevant questions relating to the patient’s previous health;
-can inform patients about the most common nursing practices, procedures and ward routines;
-can communicate in English as part of a multi-professional care team;
-understands and can use articles and texts in the field;
-can further develop his/her English skills in the field by effectively using dictionaries and other language learning tools.
Content (course unit)
-patient interview
-guidance and instruction sessions prior to and during examinations
-relevant terminology in the field
-relevant terminology in anatomy
-research reports
-medical terminology
Prerequisites (course unit)
Level: Upper secondary school studies or equivalent skills
Common European Framework for Languages Level B2.1
Evaluation methods and criteria
Active participation in planning the learning process and working during the course, written and oral assignments, self-assessment, and exam.
Teaching methods
exam
independent e-learning
contact teaching
collaborative learning
exercises
oral presentation
Learning materials
Tabula (Enrollment key provided at the beginning of the course.)
Assessment criteria - fail (0) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Hylätty kirjallinen tentti ja/tai suullinen näyttö (sisältötavoitteet jäävät saavuttamatta, huomattavia puutteita rakenteissa tai oikeakielisyydessä). Laiminlyönnit tehtävien palauttamisessa ja/tai poissaolokäytäntöjen noudattamattomuus.
Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
The student
- can write his/her thesis in English but has problems with grammar and style
- can use references but makes mistakes frequently
- can search for information in scientific publications and other professional sources but has problems in interpreting and utilising it
- is somewhat able to write a structured essay in academic problem based style but has problems with grammar, style and argumentation
- is acquainted with some customs of negotiation, meeting and conference skills
- is somewhat able to operate in negotiations, meetings and conferences, but does not know how to use different strategies to reach his/her aims
- is somewhat able to communicate using different styles, but does not know how to use different registers or how to take into account the details of the interaction situation
- knows some ways to develop his/her professional language skills and language learning skills further by utilising different tools and strategies
Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
The student
- can write his/her thesis grammatically fairly well and knows most relevant stylistical aspects
- can use references mostly correctly
- can search for information in scientific publications and other professional sources and knows how to interpret and utilise most of it
- is able to write a fairly structured, illustrative and argumentative essay in academic problem based style
- is acquainted with the customs of negotiation, meeting and conference skills
- is able to operate in negotiations, meetings and conferences using some strategies to reach his/her aims
- is able to communicate using different styles and takes into account some details of the interaction situation
- knows how to develop his/her professional language skills and language learning skills further by utilising different tools and strategies
Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
The student
- can write his/her thesis grammatically and stylistically well
- can use references correctly
- can search for information in scientific publications and other professional sources, interpret it, and utilise it with ease
- is able to write a structured, illustrative and argumentative essay in academic problem based style
- is well acquainted with the customs of negotiation, meeting and conference skills
- is able to operate in negotiations, meetings and conferences using various strategies successfully to reach his/her aims
- is able to communicate effectively using different styles and registers and takes into account all the details of the interaction situation
- knows extensively how to develop his/her professional language skills and language learning skills further by utilising different tools and strategies