Graphics in Motion (5 cr)
Code: IM00BR80-3002
General information
- Enrolment period
- 02.07.2015 - 01.09.2015
- Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
- 02.09.2015 - 23.10.2015
- Implementation has ended.
- Credits
- 5 cr
- Local portion
- 5 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Contact learning
- Unit
- Media and Arts
- Campus
- TAMK Mediapolis
- Teaching languages
- English
- Seats
- 5 - 25
- Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Media and Arts
- Teachers
- Carita Forsgren
- Antti Perälä
- Tuomo Joronen
- Person in charge
- Tuomo Joronen
- Small groups
- avoin (Size: 2 . Open UAS : 2.)
- Small groups
- avoin
- Course
- IM00BR80
Objectives (course unit)
Student is able to use theoretical aspects in animation production and they are able to combine data visualization with moving image. Student is able to collaborate in an international student team.
Content (course unit)
The student makes experiments Infographics, kinetic typography, the theoretical principles of animation.
Prerequisites (course unit)
Basics of the subject.
Exam schedules
No exam
Evaluation methods and criteria
Tasks, attendance, active participation, feedback to peers and teacher(s)
Assessment scale
0-5
Teaching methods
contact teaching (in English), individual and group tasks, virtual learning environment (Tabula), activity excursions, discussions, group work, giving and listening peer & teacher feedback, PBL on occasion, learning by doing, students as teachers
Learning materials
Course material given in class
Student workload
The student is expected to complete the course tasks partly outside the contact teaching times
Completion alternatives
The student can pass the course without attendance by: showing a showreel of their skills
Further information
Preliminary requirements: Introduction level courses on Visual Design tools (such as Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Illustrator), or corresponding skills.
Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
1 = approved; half of the course tasks submitted; some misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; attendance level low; no feedback to peers and teacher(s)
2 = satisfactory; more than half of the course tasks submitted; quality of tasks below average; attendance level low or average; hardly any feedback to peers and teacher(s)
Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
3 = good; all course tasks submitted; course attendance and feedback to peers satisfactory
4 = very good; all tasks rendered and submitted correctly in due time; good course attendance and activity; active feedback to peers and teacher(s)
Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
5 = excellent; all tasks rendered in an outstanding way and submitted on schedule; high attendance and activity; active and well-thought feedback to peers and teacher(s)