Advanced 3D WorkshopLaajuus (5 cr)
Code: IM00DU44
Credits
5 op
Objectives
Student is able to:
- Use up to date 3D-techniques, tools and working methods
- Utilise new research directions in the field of 3D
- Apply different 3D-techniques in real life projects
Content
- Up to date 3D-techniques, tools and working methods
- New research directions in the field of 3D
- 3D-techniques in real life projects
Prerequisites
Basics of 3D modeling.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:
https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:
https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:
https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi
Enrolment period
08.05.2024 - 01.10.2024
Timing
27.09.2024 - 30.12.2024
Credits
5 op
Virtual portion
1 op
RDI portion
1 op
Mode of delivery
80 % Contact teaching, 20 % Online learning
Unit
Media and Arts
Campus
TAMK Mediapolis
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
15 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Media and Arts
Teachers
- Antti Perälä
- Media-and-Arts Virtuaalihenkilö
Person in charge
Antti Perälä
Groups
-
19MEDIAART
-
22MEDIAART
-
21MEDIAART
-
20MEDIAART
-
23MEDIAARTDegree Programme in Media and Arts
Objectives (course unit)
Student is able to:
- Use up to date 3D-techniques, tools and working methods
- Utilise new research directions in the field of 3D
- Apply different 3D-techniques in real life projects
Content (course unit)
- Up to date 3D-techniques, tools and working methods
- New research directions in the field of 3D
- 3D-techniques in real life projects
Prerequisites (course unit)
Basics of 3D modeling.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)
TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:
https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi
Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)
TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:
https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi
Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)
TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:
https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi
Location and time
Zoom
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation of the independent assignments during the course (no additional exam or course work project)
Assessment scale
0-5
Teaching methods
Online lectures and independent assignments
Student workload
27h x 5cr = 135h
Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
1 = approved; more than half of the required work performed; some misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; attendance level low; little to no interactivity between peers and teacher(s)
2 = satisfactory; more than half of the required work succesfully performed; quality of work below average; attendance level low or average; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)
Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
3 = good; all course work performed; quality of work decent; attendance level good; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)
4 = very good; all work performed and submitted correctly in due time; quality of work good; attendance level good; a lot of good quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).
Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
5 = excellent; all work performed in an outstanding way and submitted on schedule; high attendance; a lot of high quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).
Enrolment period
08.05.2023 - 06.10.2023
Timing
05.10.2023 - 20.12.2023
Credits
5 op
Virtual portion
1 op
RDI portion
1 op
Mode of delivery
80 % Contact teaching, 20 % Online learning
Unit
Media and Arts
Campus
TAMK Mediapolis
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
15 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Media and Arts
Teachers
- Markku Laskujärvi
- Antti Perälä
Person in charge
Antti Perälä
Groups
-
19MEDIAART
-
22MEDIAART
-
21MEDIAART
-
20MEDIAART
-
23MEDIAARTDegree Programme in Media and Arts
Objectives (course unit)
Student is able to:
- Use up to date 3D-techniques, tools and working methods
- Utilise new research directions in the field of 3D
- Apply different 3D-techniques in real life projects
Content (course unit)
- Up to date 3D-techniques, tools and working methods
- New research directions in the field of 3D
- 3D-techniques in real life projects
Prerequisites (course unit)
Basics of 3D modeling.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)
TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:
https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi
Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)
TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:
https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi
Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)
TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:
https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi
Location and time
Zoom
Assessment methods and criteria
Evaluation of the independent assignments during the course (no additional exam or course work project)
Assessment scale
0-5
Teaching methods
Online lectures and independent assignments
Student workload
27h x 5cr = 135h
Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
1 = approved; more than half of the required work performed; some misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; attendance level low; little to no interactivity between peers and teacher(s)
2 = satisfactory; more than half of the required work succesfully performed; quality of work below average; attendance level low or average; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)
Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
3 = good; all course work performed; quality of work decent; attendance level good; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)
4 = very good; all work performed and submitted correctly in due time; quality of work good; attendance level good; a lot of good quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).
Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
5 = excellent; all work performed in an outstanding way and submitted on schedule; high attendance; a lot of high quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).