Study Guide

Objectives (course unit)

Student is able to produce an advanced community based, site specific or game related artwork.
Student is able to apply critical thinking of sociocultural perspectives in the context of contemporary art.

Content (course unit)

Student makes collaboration with a company or an institution.
Student develops a new innovative first version of an applied fine art project.
Student makes own version of previous artwork in the given context.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Location and time

Mediapolis and online. The course starts 25.10.2023

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

Mostly onsite work, online tuition, group work, independent work

Learning materials

To be given during the course

Student workload

135 hours student work, 50 hours teacher work.

Content scheduling

Please see schedule.

Completion alternatives

-

Practical training and working life cooperation

Virtual lab

Further information

360-production for the Virtual lab in the main campus and video wall 2nd floor in Mediapolis.
Software DaVinci Resolve and Karta VR-tool.
Teachers: Ilmari Huttu-Hiltunen
Fanny Niemi-Junkola

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Levels 1-2
Situation-specific, (imitative) and limited professional skills:
Can recognise and define field-related phenomena and basic concepts.
Recognises. Names. Defines. Manages the assigned tasks under supervision/assisted.
Knows diverse courses of action but cannot justify his/her choices.
Routine performance. Pre-learned performance.
Can give and receive feedback.
Considers and assesses things from his/her viewpoint.
Can work in a group.
Recognises his/her interaction skills.
Recognises important courses of action in the field.
Takes responsibility for his/her own work.
Can describe the economic and wellbeing related effects of his/her own work.

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Levels 3-4
Structured, evaluative and applied professional skills:
Structures relations between field-related phenomena and concepts.
Applies. Explains. Compares. Structures things in relation to one another.
Can select the most appropriate course of action from diverse options and justify his/her choice.
Makes a plan/plans. Limits tasks/problems. Solves problems.
Can give and receive feedback actively and constructively.
Considers and assesses things both from his/her and the close community's viewpoint.
Can cooperate responsibly and is ready to develop his/her interaction skills.
Recognises and follows the important courses of action in the field.
Takes responsibility and commits to the group activities in addition to his/her own work.
Can describe and assess the economic and wellbeing related effects of his/her own work.

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Level 5
Extensive, creative and developing professional skills:
Understands extensive entities and relations between them.
Generalises. Analyses. Relates to the professional context.
Can search for diverse courses of action and solution alternatives, justify his/her choices and try new courses of action. Assesses diverse solution alternatives.
Combines solution alternatives creatively or creates new ones.
Uses feedback systematically as a professional growth tool in his/her own work and the community.
Considers and assesses himself/herself and his/her professional community or task.
Can cooperate responsibly, flexibly and constructively. Develops his/her own and the group's interaction.
Works responsibly and in a committed manner considering the community and field requirements and needs.
Understands the economic and wellbeing related effects of his/her work and can anticipate them in his/her work.

Objectives (course unit)

Student is able to produce an advanced community based, site specific or game related artwork.
Student is able to apply critical thinking of sociocultural perspectives in the context of contemporary art.

Content (course unit)

Student makes collaboration with a company or an institution.
Student develops a new innovative first version of an applied fine art project.
Student makes own version of previous artwork in the given context.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Location and time

Mediapolis and online. The course starts 21.9.2022

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

Onsite and online tuition, group work, independent work

Student workload

135 hours student work, 50 hours teacher work.

Content scheduling

21.9.- 23.11.2022
Please see schedule.

Completion alternatives

-

Further information

Introduction and working with AR (Augmented Reality), implementations according to you own skills and material. Own laptop required, the course provides Arilyn passwords.
In addition learning the interactive videowall use in Mediapolis campus.

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Levels 1-2
Situation-specific, (imitative) and limited professional skills:
Can recognise and define field-related phenomena and basic concepts.
Recognises. Names. Defines. Manages the assigned tasks under supervision/assisted.
Knows diverse courses of action but cannot justify his/her choices.
Routine performance. Pre-learned performance.
Can give and receive feedback.
Considers and assesses things from his/her viewpoint.
Can work in a group.
Recognises his/her interaction skills.
Recognises important courses of action in the field.
Takes responsibility for his/her own work.
Can describe the economic and wellbeing related effects of his/her own work.

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Levels 3-4
Structured, evaluative and applied professional skills:
Structures relations between field-related phenomena and concepts.
Applies. Explains. Compares. Structures things in relation to one another.
Can select the most appropriate course of action from diverse options and justify his/her choice.
Makes a plan/plans. Limits tasks/problems. Solves problems.
Can give and receive feedback actively and constructively.
Considers and assesses things both from his/her and the close community's viewpoint.
Can cooperate responsibly and is ready to develop his/her interaction skills.
Recognises and follows the important courses of action in the field.
Takes responsibility and commits to the group activities in addition to his/her own work.
Can describe and assess the economic and wellbeing related effects of his/her own work.

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Level 5
Extensive, creative and developing professional skills:
Understands extensive entities and relations between them.
Generalises. Analyses. Relates to the professional context.
Can search for diverse courses of action and solution alternatives, justify his/her choices and try new courses of action. Assesses diverse solution alternatives.
Combines solution alternatives creatively or creates new ones.
Uses feedback systematically as a professional growth tool in his/her own work and the community.
Considers and assesses himself/herself and his/her professional community or task.
Can cooperate responsibly, flexibly and constructively. Develops his/her own and the group's interaction.
Works responsibly and in a committed manner considering the community and field requirements and needs.
Understands the economic and wellbeing related effects of his/her work and can anticipate them in his/her work.